View cart “2018 Ministry of Women Affairs HQTRS Monthly Budget Performance Report” has been added to your cart.
View cart “2018 Approved Ekiti State Ministry of Women Affairs Budget” has been added to your cart.
View cart “2015 Approved Lagos State Ministry of Women Affairs Budget” has been added to your cart.
View cart “Oyo State Child Rights Law 2006” has been added to your cart.
Dekker v. Stichting (1986) (Interpretation of Articles 2 and 3 of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (Official Journal 1976 L 39, p. 40))
Dekker v. Stichting (1986) (Interpretation of Articles 2 and 3 of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (Official Journal 1976 L 39, p. 40))
Categories Case Laws, EU, Regional Mechanism Decisions
Tags Civil liability, Council Directive 76/207/EEC, Directive interpretation, Employment access, Equal treatment, Gender discrimination, gender equality, Grounds of exemption, Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, Legal action in damages, Maternity leave, Pregnancy discrimination, preliminary ruling, Sexual discrimination, Unfitness for work, VJV Centrum
In the case of Dekker v. Stichting (1986), the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands) referred questions to the European Court of Justice under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty for a preliminary ruling. The case involved Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker and Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV Centrum) Plus and revolved around the interpretation of Council Directive 76/207/EEC, which pertains to equal treatment for men and women in employment access, vocational training, promotion, and working conditions.
₦500.00
